True or False: Conflicts between federal law and state law are resolved by federal law superseding state law.

The statement that conflicts between federal law and state law are resolved by federal law superseding state law is indeed true. This principle is derived from the Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution, which establishes that federal law takes precedence over state law in the event of a conflict.

When there is a direct conflict between state and federal legislation, the federal law will prevail, and the state law will be deemed invalid in that area. This ensures a uniform legal framework across all states, which is essential for maintaining consistency in the application of laws that pertain to issues that cross state lines or involve federal interests.

States do have the power to enact laws that provide more rights or protections than federal law but not less. Therefore, when evaluating legal situations, if a federal statute is challenged, it will typically overrule conflicting state laws, reinforcing the authority of federal legislation.

This principle is a cornerstone of federalism in the United States and is critical for professionals dealing with legal matters in a multi-jurisdictional environment.